Schedule:

Extended session:

·      10:00    Alex Dimitrov                    Intoduction

·      10:10    William Levy                    Energy Efficiency as a Constraint on Neural Computation

·      10:50    David Goldberg                An Efficiency Approach to Spike Coding      

·      11:20 – 11:35        Discussions and break

·      11:35    Sam Wang                      Speed limits in mammalian brains: scaling constraints from biophysics

·      12:15    Mark Nelson                    Design constraints for an active sensing system

·      12:55 – 13:10        Discussions and break              

·      13:10    Raul Rodriguez-Esteban     Adjacency as a measure of cost  

·      13:40    Mitya Chklovskii                Wiring cost minimization explains many features of brain architecture

·      14:20    Alex Dimitrov                    Unit failure and neural circuit complexity

·      14:45                  Closing comments and discussions

·      15:00                  Session ends

 

 

List of speakers

David Goldberg

Title:  An Efficiency Approach to Spike Coding

Abstract:

Many have argued that efficient representation of information in the
nervous system has an evolutionary advantage. This efficiency principle
has been used to predict and explain neural processing on the functional
level, and has provided us with concepts such as redundancy reduction.
In this work, we apply this optimization approach to neural processing
on the physical level, specifically to the question of how neurons
represent information with spikes. We explore how the physical
properties of the channel and latency requirements influence whether a
rate code or a temporal code is more efficient.

 

William B Levy

Title:  Energy Efficiency as a Constraint on Neural Computation

Abstract:  Many parametric observations in Nature can be made sensible
when interpreted from the perspective of energy efficiency.  Some of us
have incorporated this energy-efficient perspective into an
information-theoretic perspective of brain function.  Specifically,
neuronal coding and neuronal computation, interpreted from the perspective
of energy efficiency, makes sense of the low firing rates and of the high
synaptic failure rates observed in forebrain cortical systems.

Mitya Chklovskii


Title: Wiring cost minimization explains many features of brain architecture

Abstract: Just as computer engineers have to solve layout and routing problems
in the process of chip design, nature had to optimize the placement
of neuronal complexes and the morphology of neuronal arbors in the
course of evolution. We attempt to reverse engineer the brain by
formulating wiring optimization problems and systematically comparing
their solutions with the anatomical data. We began to assemble a solid
theoretical framework that unifies many previously disjoint anatomical
facts. Such framework helps explain existing experimental observations
and guide future experiments.

Mark Nelson

Title: Design constraints for an active sensing system

Abstract: The electrosensory system of weakly electric fish provides an
interesting case study for exploring a variety of influences on
the design of an active sensing system.  Topics to be considered
include metabolic constraints associated with the generation of
an electric field to actively probe the envrionment, biophysical
constraints associated with reliable transduction of weak
(microvolt-level) voltage perturbations, signal processing
constraints associated with low signal-to-noise conditions, and
functional constraints that may help explain the presence of
multiple topographic maps in the brainstem electrosensory
nucleus. Neuroethological analysis suggests that sensory system
design is strongly influenced by the dynamic coupling between brain,
body and environment that occurs in the context of natural
behavioral tasks.

Alex Dimitrov

Title: Unit failure and neural circuit complexity

 

Abstract: Are larger and more complex brains just a collection of more of the same
basic building elements, or do they differ in some more fundamental aspects? I argue
that one important aspect in which large brains differ from small brains is in the
different needs to protect from failures of basic computational elements. Large brains
tend to exist in longer-living animals, and long life places more stringent requirements
on error correction and unit failure. Using tools from the theory of reliable computation
(akin to information theory), I derive some trends in relative circuit complexity and
demonstrate those trends in insects (ultra-short to short-living species) and mammals
(medium- to long-living species).

 

Sam Wang

Title: Speed limits in mammalian brains: scaling constraints from biophysics

Abstract: The mammalian neocortex scales according to orderly power laws.  This
allometric scaling suggests that variation in neocortical form, previously
known only as empirical phenomena, reflects shared design principles.  We
find that several scaling laws can be explained by a requirement to keep
fast cross-brain conduction times at 1-2 milliseconds, independent of
brain size.  Because faster conduction requires thicker axons, the fastest
axons occupy disproportionately more space in big brains. The consequent
increases in volume can account quantitatively for increases in the ratio
of white matter to gray matter volume.  Thus, macroscopic neocortical
scaling is explainable in terms of biophysical constraints.

 

Raul Rodriguez-Esteban

Title: Adjacency as a measure of cost

Abstract: Recent results in the field of neuroanatomy have pointed out that a simple
metric rule such as accounting the connections between adjacent pairs of
neuronal entities seems to be a good indicator of overall connection cost.
The preeminence of such an elementary adjacency rule over more sophisticated
metric measures is one of an intriguing nature. The possibility that the
design of the nervous system is somehow driven by a save-wire paradigm
compels us to bring this adjacency rule under tighter scrutiny. For this
matter, we have developed a number of different mathematical and
analytical tools to confront this task. We have also proposed a number of
hypotheses on what are the mechanisms involved and what are the
implications that this phenomenon suggests. The use of the adjacency rule
as a primitive chip design technique raises questions about the
relationship between this type of design and the design of the nervous
system architecture.